02
to criticise it, even if we could, and to criticise it when
the accounts come under audit would be so long after the
transaction as to render criticism of little service. I
therefore submit that in the unusual circumstances holding
in Hong Kong we must accept without criticism Government
decisions of this nature as a matter of Government policy.
6 •
B•
The next point is more complicated and can be
summarised in the question "When does the loss, if any,
actually fall upon the Government funds and at what stage
should it be shown in the a ccounts?"
7.
If the purchase in these circumstandes of a
remittance, which will probably
-
as was the case in this
instance -be placed in the Joint Colonial Fund and o nly
withdrawn as required, is to be regarded as a final transact-
ion then any loss or gain must at once be debited or credited
to the "Exchange Account" which ultimately affects revenue
or expenditure, and if the latter a Vote of Council will be
required. This is clearly laid down in paragraph 2 of
X
Secretary of State's 431 of 26th November,1925, forwarded with
your 375/544 of 7th December,1925.
8.
But the view can be taken that the purchase of
such a remittance is merely transferring some portion of the
cash balance from Hong Kong to England; dollars, and dollars
only, appear in the Treasurer's accounts and such a transfer
only means an alteration in the distribution of the cash
balance.
9.
Under this view it is not until the money is
withdrawn from the Joint Colonial Fund and used by the
Crown
*47171207/25
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.